This story has been updated to include comments from Guillermo Morales. The Johnson County Board of Supervisors voted to oust its Executive Director Guillermo Morales at its Sept. 4 work session, citing complaints about his “abrasive” treatment of staff members. Supervisors Rod Sullivan, Royceann Porter and Lisa Douglas-Green voted for immediate termination, with Supervisors V […]
Already a subscriber? Log in
Want to Read More?
Get immediate, unlimited access to all subscriber content and much more.
Learn more in our subscriber FAQ.
- Unparalleled business coverage of the Iowa City / Cedar Rapids corridor.
- Immediate access to subscriber-only content on our website.
- 26 issues per year delivered digitally, in print or both.
- Support locally owned and operated journalism.
This story has been updated to include comments from Guillermo Morales.
The Johnson County Board of Supervisors voted to oust its Executive Director Guillermo Morales at its Sept. 4 work session, citing complaints about his "abrasive" treatment of staff members. Supervisors Rod Sullivan, Royceann Porter and Lisa Douglas-Green voted for immediate termination, with Supervisors V Fixmer-Oraiz and Jon Green casting the dissenting votes. The meeting began with a debate on whether or not the session would be a closed one, with some back-and-forth between Board Chair Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Morales. “I was denied the right to know what this is about,” Mr. Morales said, in response to whether or not he preferred the session to be open or closed. According to Iowa law, governmental bodies can perform closed sessions, typically when the subject matter relates to a staff performance evaluation, legal counsel or the purchase and sale of real estate. “How am I going to know whether this is going to impact my reputation, without knowing what the subject matter is?,” he asked, adding that he had inquired “three times” about the evaluation’s content the previous Friday. Mr. Sullivan dispensed with public commentary and read from a statement he prepared, outlining expectations for Mr. Morales’ role and how he fell short. Calling Mr. Morales “insubordinate, argumentative, and disrespectful,” and “a constant source of friction,” Mr. Sullivan said he has fielded numerous complaints from different departments within the county, spending “countless hours apologizing for your rudeness and trying to mend fences, only to watch you continue your abrasive and corrosive behavior.” Mr. Morales was hired in March 2023, replacing former Executive Director Mike Hensch. According to a job description listed on the Johnson County website, the board office executive director “provides administrative guidance to the Board of Supervisors and ensures the effective operation of the Board Office and its staff. The Executive Director is also responsible for overseeing the Board Office’s daily operations, projects, policies, budgets, and strategic initiatives on behalf of the Board of Supervisors.” “In terms of performance evaluations, this is unprecedented,” said Mx. Fixmer-Oraiz, calling the abrupt termination “inappropriate” and requesting a motion to have Mr. Morales undergo a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) instead. Supervisor Green seconded the motion, saying that the abrupt termination would be appropriate only for “egregious” incidents, and the county should follow proper protocols in employee discipline. The motion failed, 3-2. Before opening the motion to terminate Mr. Morales, Ms. Porter asked if it was feasible to give him the option to resign, to which he replied, “I think a resignation would negatively impact my claim for wrongful termination.”
The Johnson County Board of Supervisors voted to oust its Executive Director Guillermo Morales at its Sept. 4 work session, citing complaints about his "abrasive" treatment of staff members. Supervisors Rod Sullivan, Royceann Porter and Lisa Douglas-Green voted for immediate termination, with Supervisors V Fixmer-Oraiz and Jon Green casting the dissenting votes. The meeting began with a debate on whether or not the session would be a closed one, with some back-and-forth between Board Chair Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Morales. “I was denied the right to know what this is about,” Mr. Morales said, in response to whether or not he preferred the session to be open or closed. According to Iowa law, governmental bodies can perform closed sessions, typically when the subject matter relates to a staff performance evaluation, legal counsel or the purchase and sale of real estate. “How am I going to know whether this is going to impact my reputation, without knowing what the subject matter is?,” he asked, adding that he had inquired “three times” about the evaluation’s content the previous Friday. Mr. Sullivan dispensed with public commentary and read from a statement he prepared, outlining expectations for Mr. Morales’ role and how he fell short. Calling Mr. Morales “insubordinate, argumentative, and disrespectful,” and “a constant source of friction,” Mr. Sullivan said he has fielded numerous complaints from different departments within the county, spending “countless hours apologizing for your rudeness and trying to mend fences, only to watch you continue your abrasive and corrosive behavior.” Mr. Morales was hired in March 2023, replacing former Executive Director Mike Hensch. According to a job description listed on the Johnson County website, the board office executive director “provides administrative guidance to the Board of Supervisors and ensures the effective operation of the Board Office and its staff. The Executive Director is also responsible for overseeing the Board Office’s daily operations, projects, policies, budgets, and strategic initiatives on behalf of the Board of Supervisors.” “In terms of performance evaluations, this is unprecedented,” said Mx. Fixmer-Oraiz, calling the abrupt termination “inappropriate” and requesting a motion to have Mr. Morales undergo a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) instead. Supervisor Green seconded the motion, saying that the abrupt termination would be appropriate only for “egregious” incidents, and the county should follow proper protocols in employee discipline. The motion failed, 3-2. Before opening the motion to terminate Mr. Morales, Ms. Porter asked if it was feasible to give him the option to resign, to which he replied, “I think a resignation would negatively impact my claim for wrongful termination.”