The Iowa City council passed a second reading, 5-1, considering an ordinance that would rezone the former Kirkwood Community College Iowa City campus site to a general industrial zone. The ordinance would rezone approximately 6.8 acres of land located at 1810, 1816, and 1828 Lower Muscatine Road to accommodate Procter & Gamble’s (P&G) expansion goals […]
Already a subscriber? Log in
Want to Read More?
Get immediate, unlimited access to all subscriber content and much more.
Learn more in our subscriber FAQ.
- Unparalleled business coverage of the Iowa City / Cedar Rapids corridor.
- Immediate access to subscriber-only content on our website.
- 26 issues per year delivered digitally, in print or both.
- Support locally owned and operated journalism.
The Iowa City council passed a second reading, 5-1, considering an ordinance that would rezone the former Kirkwood Community College Iowa City campus site to a general industrial zone.
The ordinance would rezone approximately 6.8 acres of land located at 1810, 1816, and 1828 Lower Muscatine Road to accommodate Procter & Gamble’s (P&G) expansion goals for Oral-B Laboratories.
In February, P&G entered into an agreement with Kirkwood to buy the former campus for $6.4 million, with plans to demolish the existing buildings to make way for a new Oral-B facility.
Currently, the land is zoned as neighborhood public, and the expansion has been a source of contention for neighborhoods that flank the campus, with concerns centering around air quality and building preservation.
At the April 2 council meeting, several residents came forward to oppose the proposition of a rezoning ordinance.
“By rezoning as proposed, you are giving Oral-B and Procter and Gamble carte blanche to do what they want…manufacturing, more buildings, waste storage, truck movement, compressors, condensers, cooling towers, storage tanks.” said Laura Ruth, Iowa City resident who lives four blocks from the site of the future manufacturing facility. “This proposed rezoning is a terrible idea and it will be impossible to undo if it is allowed to proceed.”
Council member Josh Moe sympathized with some public commentator’s calls to preserve the Kirkwood campus buildings, but said the council’s options are limited as far as mandating what a property owner can and cannot do with existing non-historic buildings.
“I don’t know that that’s an option for us,” he said.